How to Double Global Food Production by 2050


Discover four steps could be taken to help feed the large population predicted for 2050 as well as reduce the sizeable harm agriculture imposes.



An international research team led by Jon Foley at the University of Minnesota’s Institute on the Environmenthas devised a 5-step plan to double global food production by 2050 as well as reduce the widespread environmental harm posed by contemporary agricultural practices. All maps here were produced by Jamie Gerber at the institute. Step 1 is to raise the crop yield of the world’s most ineffective farms to 95 percent of the best yields attained by farmers in similar climates. Closing this “yield gap” for the top 16 crops worldwide could produce 50 to 60 percent more food.


Improving seeds, irrigation, fertilizer use and markets would drive up yield for many crops. For example, the yield for maize (shown) could rise significantly across parts of Mexico, Africa, Eastern Europe and elsewhere.


Only 62 percent of crops become human food; 35 percent feed meat and dairy animals (the remainder is for biofuels and other uses). If humans switched to all-plant diets, all that agricultural land could produce 50 percent more human food, because feeding crops to animals that then become meat is a highly inefficient way to transfer plant energy to people. Although such a big change is unlikely, even a small shift away from meat could net many more human calories.


If the world’s top 16 crops were grown only for human food, instead of the current mix that includes animal feed and biofuels, a billion tons more human food would be available—roughly equivalent to three quadrillion kilocalories. Reducing waste is a corollary step: Roughly 30 percent of the food grown worldwide is lost to failed crops, stockpiles ruined by pests, food that is never delivered because of bad infrastructure or markets, and food that spoils or is thrown away after purchase.


Read more on How to Double Global Food Production by 2050 and Reduce Environmental Damage: Scientific American

Reblogged from: and smarterplanet

(Photo © Mendhak)

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Vous pouvez utiliser ces balises et attributs HTML : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>